Authentic Brands Group Sues Anthropic Over Alleged Unauthorized Use of 274 Elvis Presley Songs
World Pulse Editorial — The WORLD PULSE editorial team covers international news, business, technology, AI, science, sport, culture and other subjects of public interest. The desk applies source attribution, editorial checks, context and corrections standards across the publication.
The byline identifies the newsroom author or editorial team responsible for this publication. Where the story is based on external reporting, those sources are identified below.
AI-assisted production may have been used in the drafting workflow. Source verification, attribution and editorial review remain the responsibility of WORLD PULSE.

The licensing firm managing Elvis Presley’s music and likeness has filed a lawsuit against AI developer Anthropic, alleging the company used 274 of the singer's songs to train its artificial intelligence models without authorization.

According to The Guardian Technology, Authentic Brands Group, the organization that manages the music and likeness rights of Elvis Presley, filed a lawsuit on Friday against artificial intelligence firm Anthropic. According to the lawsuit, Anthropic allegedly utilized 274 songs from Presley’s catalog—including "Can’t Help Falling in Love," "All Shook Up," and "A Little Less Conversation"—to train its AI model, Claude, without permission.
Lead attorney Richard Busch stated in the filing that the defendant has "built its entire business model based on copyright infringement at a scale never seen before." The plaintiffs are seeking damages of $150,000 per infringed track, totaling approximately $41 million. The lawsuit further alleges that Anthropic continued to engage in willful infringement even after attempting to implement guardrails intended to limit the output of copyrighted material.
This litigation marks a notable development in the intersection of generative AI and intellectual property, as it is among the first major legal challenges brought directly by an artist’s estate against an AI developer. While major music labels and the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) have previously initiated similar copyright infringement claims, this case could establish a significant precedent for how AI companies interact with existing musical catalogs.
The lawsuit claims that Claude was developed using copyrighted material from catalogs found across the internet. Concerns regarding the use of music and voices in AI training, as well as the potential for AI-generated content to replace human-made music, have been central to ongoing debates in the industry. As reported by The Guardian, this legal action follows broader industry trends, including Spotify's recent removal of approximately 50 million AI-generated tracks from its recommendations platform.
Topic coverage
Follow recurring subjects across the WORLD PULSE newsroom.
Topics
Developing story
Follow the latest developments
Recent WORLD PULSE coverage with overlapping event terms is grouped here so readers can follow how the story is developing.
Reader interest
Most read
UKKelsey Parker Welcomes New Baby Named River Following Heartbreaking Stillbirth
AIOpenAI Discloses New Safety Issues and Outlines Plan for Tracking Incidents
SportsAsian Games Facing Accommodation Crisis and Weather Disruptions in Nagoya, JapanMore from the newsroom
Latest stories
SportsMilwaukee Brewers Secure First World Series Title with Game 5 Victory Over Rays
WorldPalestinians in Gaza and West Bank voice deep skepticism toward Israeli election
WorldKing Charles III Faces Growing Demands for Reparations During Caribbean Tour
SportsFantasy Basketball Risers and Fallers: Evaluating Early-Season Player Performance
AsiaKylian Mbappé Loses Chinese Sponsorships After Comments Regarding Mao Zedong
World68 Dead After High-Speed Trains Collide Near Toledo, Spain
TechnologyAnthropic S-1 Filing Details Financial Losses, AI Security Risks and Infrastructure HurdlesResearch & context
Explore WORLD PULSE reference pages
Use these newsroom indexes to follow related coverage, review publication timelines and explore how WORLD PULSE reporting is organized.
Sources & attribution
The external reports, announcements or publications used to inform this article are listed here for attribution and reader context. A source link does not mean WORLD PULSE independently endorses every claim in that source.
Questions about sourcing, attribution or corrections: contact the newsroom.